Your session is going to timeout resulting from inactivity. Click on Okay to extend your time and energy for a further 0 minutes.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or small Minimize. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to circulation in the powder actions additional smoothly, assisting to alleviate the consistent cutting of granules.

The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is exactly why you're observing higher velocities received with that powder, instead of Everything you've found Together with the IMR things. Also excellent powder, but to some degree better suited to a little bit smaller sized scenarios with a bit less capability.

Minnesota H4831SC is my go to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the little I've left for slide 2021. I'd start out minimal and operate your way up, dependant upon what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.

INgunner54 mentioned: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Found a node and shot some groups.

Any load data to assist that? My initial considered is it isn't intending to burn the many way and velocities are going to be gradual and everywhere. Could possibly be a nice fireworks Screen!

You may have to make some a lot more posts to receive cleared to accomplish PM's. Once you reach that status I would publish during h4831 vs h4831sc the categorized reloading section to discover if everyone is near you for any trade.

and you might like to put money into some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does improve over time. 4831 powder of years back just isn't exact as what is now available. that is why a person seriously interested in reloading properly should have the most present-day load data publications to make reference to.

Currently employing IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber and h4831sc yields a little bit more velocity. In addition to it currently being quick Reduce, what is the primary difference in h4831sc these two powders, and should I swap to H4831sc?

Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain dimension, thus, the designation SC or quick Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to move with the powder steps more effortlessly, assisting to alleviate the consistent chopping of granules.

As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really precisely the same/equivalent powder cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.

Again to old web-site Shut If there is something with your cart, it won't be introduced about for the outdated web-site.

rayporter said: i in no way recognized a difference apart from the standard is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Simply click to expand...

IMR4831 and H4831SC are unique. Where by you might be confusing it and thinking that it is close is H4831 and H4831SC are very comparable. These two are just about the identical except H4831SC is produced to smaller sized grains so it meters simpler.